Talk:Final Fantasy Tactics A2: Grimoire of the Rift/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 10:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   "and forms part of the Ivalice Alliance" - I think this could be presented better for people unfamiliar with the series, perhaps explicitly describing Ivalice as a fictional universe

   " and Judges supervising battles" - this is confusing to people unfamiliar with the series, you'll have to present it better in the lead if you want to keep it there

   "were later used in mobile titles" - I'd wikilink 'mobile titles' to 'Mobile game'

   "which cost Clan Points" - your going to have to explain what Clan points are if you want to keep this

   "a series of titles released principally" - guessing the period before this is supposed to be a comma?

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Looks really good. Placing on hold until minor issues are addresssed. Freikorp (talk) 10:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

@Freikorp: I think I've addressed all the issues you raised. --ProtoDrake (talk) 11:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Looks good to me, happy to pass this now. Well done. Freikorp (talk) 13:18, 7 March 2018 (UTC)