Talk:Ficus opposita
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Last edit about it capable of treating some kind of infection
[edit]Does a source about "traditional healing" count as realiable? Honestly, this is like consulting a homeopathic medicine book about its effectiveness. -ImmernochEkelAlfred(Spam me! (or send me serious messages, whatever you like)) 08:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Ficus aculeata
[edit]Not sure why there is a redirect for Ficus aculeata to this species. Both Commonwealth Heads of Australian Herbaria (https://biodiversity.org.au/nsl/services/search?product=APC&tree.id=51209179&name=ficus+aculeata&inc._scientific=&inc.scientific=on&inc._cultivar=&max=100&display=apc&search=true )and plants of the world online (http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:852338-1 ) recognise Ficus aculeata as an accepted species. Can we change this so that Ficus aculeata has its own article, without problems??? MargaretRDonald (talk) 04:57, 7 July 2018 (UTC)