Talk:Fiat BR.20 Cicogna

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / European / Italian C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Horsepower#CV and cv|cv]] The anchor (#CV and cv) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Comparison with other types

I am about to make a drastic revision of the section, eliminating nearly all the comparisons with the SM.79 which is mainly peripheral information at best. A few simple statements indicating the superiority of the SM.79 should suffice. Comments? FWIW Bzuk 20:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Agree - sounds like some of it was written by the SM.79 fan club, mostly not relevant. MilborneOne 20:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - I've tried to trim it down, but it could still do with major axe work.Nigel Ish 23:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Churchill quote

I removed the following uncited text:

"On the same day, the Italian fleet was torpedoed at Taranto, so Churchill said: "It was better for them, rest to protect their fleet in Italy."^{[citation needed]}"

While it is quite likely that Churchill said something pithy on this ocasion, the quote is completly uncited and appears to have been mangled in translation. If a cite can be found that states what he actually said, then it may be able to go backNigel Ish (talk) 19:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As Churchill remarked of the hapless Italian raiders of the Medway incursion: "They might have found better employment defending their Fleet at Taranto [1]. MilborneOne (talk) 19:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More of the same

Well, here's another one of those "comprehensive" articles! I can see that a vast amount of hard work has already been done by some valiant editors, but on first sight it seems there is still a need for readability and grammar polishing. Further trimming would be useful, but I'm afraid I might edit out portions that others may have laboured on for some time and so I'm a bit reluctant to make a start. At least there is a sprinkling of inline references through this article! --Red Sunset 22:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Armstrong Whitworth Whitley

Armstrong - Whitworth Whitley should be added on the list of comparable aircraft. Korina (talk) 20:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]