Talk:Fenix Nickel Project

Guatemala Low‑importance

	Guatemala portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guatemala, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guatemala on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuatemalaWikipedia:WikiProject GuatemalaTemplate:WikiProject GuatemalaGuatemala articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

re undiscussed name change

The mining press is not the only kind of RS there is; Google news has 9 results for the new title but for the former title. There are 405 results for "Fenix nickel project" in Googlebooks, and 1,220 results in GoogleBooks for "Fenix mine"

I suggest you move it back, if you can override the redirect now in the way; because of the bot-placed template that appeared on teh redirect I don't think I can do it, as I'm not an admin, using revert in the move log. If you can't I'll contact an admin; the mining industry's most common usage is not viable as a title unless it were also common use in writings about the mine...and it's clearly not.Skookum1 (talk) 09:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Fenix mine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More to do

I just expanded quite a lot, and I'm done for now, but there could be more on the lawsuits. The lawsuits might even warrant their own article. A search for "choc v hudbay" on google scholar shows a lot of coverage in law journals and the suit has implications for corporate accountability in Canada for offenses overseas. (Rather like Kiobel or Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp. in the US). Larataguera (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And obviously geology and better production numbers. (This is almost an article on the conflict as it is, and should possibly be spun off to Fenix mine conflict or something.) Larataguera (talk) 00:21, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also just looked over some of the peer-reviewed literature on the conflict (not just the lawsuits), and there's quite a lot. Honestly someone could spend weeks getting this one conflict to FA/GA, and there are thousands of these conflicts. It's a lot to do.... Larataguera (talk) 01:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]