Talk:Felpham
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
King George's (playing) Field
[edit]Many sports and events do or could use the field, if there is a notable (encyclopedic) group then feel free to place the information under the "Sports and recreation" heading but do not tag it onto the day-facto mention of the playing field existence. (under this heading mention might even be made of the Sea Scouts etc.), also the playing-field is not the 'Home' to any group, please don't imply it is, groups only use the field. SouthernElectric 14:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Whatever
[edit]Truly great use of grammar and punctuation in this article! Not to mention capitalisation (assuming it shouldn't be caPitAliZaTion or some other nonsense). We don't need no education... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.16.59.88 (talk) 21:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Felpham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608075926/http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf to http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)