Talk:Felicia Nimue Ackerman
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 June 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The problem with this article is not the subject, but the poor, stub-like attempt at writing an entry.
I think Professor Ackerman is notable, okay, she’s not Madame Curie or Dom Deluise, but she is notable in her way.
Some enterprising writer (not me) should put a bit of time into this article and set it up for others to add to. Do some reading elsewhere about Professor Ackerman before voting to delete. It can be saved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:D14A:FE00:B8F3:43D8:31EF:E801 (talk) 06:04, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class philosopher articles
- Low-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- Start-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- Start-Class Women writers articles
- Mid-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles