Jump to content

Talk:Fehmarn Belt fixed link

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Purpose

[edit]

What is the purpose yet another link on top of the Store Baelt and Øresund bridges? Why on earth does dear little Denmark, which has one of the highest standards of living in the world and is one of the happiest places to live, wish to transform itself into a transit land on the level of Belgium? It should be abandoned and the perceived inconvenience lived with. T A Francis (talk) 16:26, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Units

[edit]

Why all the weird imperial units? This is a page about a project in Northern Europe where we use SI and the miles/feet add nothing but noise. The English wikipedia is not just for North American users; is the de facto international wikipedia and used by plenty of people who have not had their brains rotted by miles, feet, rods, furlongs, etc. Peter Lund/82.143.195.118 (talk) 13:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is in the wikipedia manual of style: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Units_of_measurement Both SI and US imperial units shall normally be provided. Brolin (talk) 23:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Can anyone add more info on the possible plans of contructing a tunnel and/or bridge across to the other side elswhere? I am quite curious as to whether any steps have been taken to decide to build infrastructure links across the:

Anyone with inside knowledge on any of these? I've posted similar requests elsewhere. Gruesome Twosome! 8v] //Big Adamsky 20:42, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to add something about the Fehmarn Belt bridge (using Google, a very good tool. I can read Danish and German), since I am interested in this subject.
Also, you can add Bering strait and Kvarken to the list, as there have been suggestions (not by any government) to build bridges there. BIL 21:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wonderful! I don't think there are any serious contemplations going on to link Russia with the United States up there, though. It would be uneconomical since so few people would use it and also technically extremely complicated given to climatic conditions. //Big Adamsky 21:21, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but that haven't prevented magazines to write detailed articles and tv stations (e.g. Discovery) to have programs about it. In reality, today there is no ferry across it and not even any road even in Alaska. Across Kvarken, at least there is a ferry, although few have taken that proposal seriously. BIL 21:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I know, there are no serious plans in place to tunnel or bridge across Georgia Strait. There's occasional talk about a bridge, of course, but nothing more. It would happen over BC Ferries' dead body... heqs 15:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A connection of this size which is actually planned by the government to be built within 10-15 years of time is the tunnel under the Boknafjord, Norway. That tunnel would be about 24 km long and 350 m deep, and the longest underwater road tunnel in the world. BIL 21:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Add the Helsinki to Tallinn Tunnel, Finland-Estonia, about 70 km to this daydream list. --BIL (talk) 08:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move and name change

[edit]

Should this article be moved to Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link as the Great belt Bridge article is named Great Belt Fixed Link? or is the suffix Fixed Link only used when the connection is a combination of a bridge and a tunnel? The article gives names in Danish and German as Fehmarn Belt Connection and not Bridge Angelbo Talk / Contribs 15:34, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Motorcentrism

[edit]

Why does the article have two (2) different maps of the regional highway networks, but not a map of the railroad networks? I want to know where I can go, not where other people can drive their cars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.170.136.173 (talk) 17:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How to modify the 'location' in the infobar?

[edit]

The 'location' map at the bottom of the infobar seems to be rather overly zoomed in. As is, it simply shows a buch of water and small pieces of land on both sides, which doesn't really add much when you already know or shortly find out that it is an undersea tunnel. Does anyone know if, and if so how, one can zoom out this map? David12345 (talk) 07:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Video 2024

[edit]

This video seem so be a few weeks old and shows the construction site. https://www.ln-online.de/lokales/ostholstein/die-deutsche-baustelle-des-fehmarnbelttunnels-von-oben-a24d24ec-b873-4d69-b68e-93076d586328.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E7:B705:350:25C2:8092:A8DC:FDFA (talk) 05:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fehmarn_Belt_fixed_link&oldid=1244957024"