Talk:Federal architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Home Living Low‑importance

	Housing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Doesn't make sense

"The founders of the United States consciously chose to associate the nation with the ancient democracies of Greece and the republican values of Rome. This was a deliberate and marked contrast with the Gothic style, which was used for many English public buildings and associated with feudalism. Federal style takes influence from the Georgian Neoclassical style, but differs in its use of plainer surfaces with attenuated detail; it was most influenced by the Adam style, an interpretation of Ancient Roman architecture fashionable after the unearthing of Pompeii and Herculaneum." BUT...this all implies that the US was trying to move away from specifically English influence by rejecting Gothic (actually I think you mean neo-Gothic - the Gothic style was in the medieval period) style and instead was influenced by ... Georgian Neoclassical - whichwas ENGLISH and Adam style ...which was ENGLISH!!!!! This whole section needs re-wording. It doesn't make sense. The ideals of Greece and Rome, sure - but through a massive English filter, borrowed ideas from England - no difference from the neo-Gothic borrowings of earlier. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.26.5 (talk) 22:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I detect an Englishman with an inferiority complex. 166.137.156.33 (talk) 01:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed

"from the Old China Trade" is meaningless to anyone outside the area. This is an encyclopaedia. You have to explain what you mean. Amandajm (talk) 11:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No description

This article doesn't actually describe what the Federal style of architecture is. Other articles about architecture will describe features of the building that distinguish it from other styles of design. But this article doesn't say anything really. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What?

This whole article is nothing but jargon. It is basically just a list of influencing styles fluffed up into paragraphs by putting different verbs in front of them. There are no specifics. What traits (construction methods, materials, layout, trim details, etc.) would you expect to see in a Federal period building? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.22.204.1 (talk) 23:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Monticello and Jefferson are not Federal

Jefferson and Monticello are most often categorized as Neoclassical or Palladian, not Federal. Dogears (talk) 11:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]