Talk:Federal Supplement

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Federal Supplement article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[LexisNexis#Lexis.com|Lexis]] The anchor (#Lexis.com) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Jwlidtnet (talk) 01:46, 21 November 2014 (UTC)I recently added some material pertaining to the precedential value of district court opinions; it's a complex subject, but I think that the current version best balances "simplification" and accuracy.[reply]

Jwlidtnet, this is important information and glad you added it - it's what I came to this page to find. I think it's important enough to have its own heading, so I'll add it.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Federal Supplement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070312234740/http://west.thomson.com:80/store/product.aspx?product_id=16008763 to http://west.thomson.com/store/product.aspx?product_id=16008763

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:47, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]