Talk:Faust and Marguerite (opera)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Title
[edit]Shouldn't this be called Faust and Marguerite? In any case we don't use titles like Mephistopheles, or Faust and Marguerite here. --Kleinzach 04:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- not when the composer gave it the title of 'Mephistopheles, or Faust and Marguerite'. I am sure that Mr Lutz would have been horrified to know that he gave his opera a title that did not fit Wikipedia convention. Perhaps we should also request that Ken Anakin changes the name of his film 'Those Magnificent Men in their Flying Machines or How I Flew from London to Paris in 25 Hours 11 Minutes' too.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.92.168.164 (talk) 14:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kleinzach, just which online sources for the title are you preferring over Sadie, Stanley; Tyrrell, John, eds. (2001). The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan Publishers. ISBN 978-1-56159-239-5.
{{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty|title=(help)? Sparafucil (talk) 03:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Kleinzach, just which online sources for the title are you preferring over Sadie, Stanley; Tyrrell, John, eds. (2001). The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan Publishers. ISBN 978-1-56159-239-5.
Requested move 1 March 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: consensus to move the pages, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:43, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- Faust and Marguerite → Faust and Marguerite (opera)
- Faust and Marguerite (disambiguation) → Faust and Marguerite
– The five brief sentences comprising this stub confirm that the minor opera in question does not fit into the mold of a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 05:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support Pageviews and Google results indicate there is not a primary topic among the notable works of the same name.--Yaksar (let's chat) 07:03, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support, no claim for primary topic. It's not the original work either since they are all based on Faust. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support In ictu oculi (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.