Talk:Fast Five (consulting)

Notability questioned?

The "fast five" were notable in that they changed the methodologies of their "big five" analogues. Before web site consulting was popularized by, the discipline of usability engineering was not regularly practiced by the traditional consulting firms. (I have personal knowledge of this, as I used to teach principles of usability and GUI design to people in traditional consulting firms. It was an uphill climb in a blinding snowstorm, with rabid wolves heckling you about the need for such concerns as "usability".)

The notability of billions of dollars in combined market capitalization, changing best practices for large-scale consulting projects, being acquired by Microsoft (Razorfish), introducing time-based competition and bringing new disciplines together (knowledge management, and integrating the "creative", "technology", and "strategy" areas together - graphic/visual design, software developers and system integrators, and management consultants. Was this a lot to do in 5-6 years? Yes. But these firms were typically full of overachievers who wanted to have a big impact on their professions. (I was personal knowledge of this as well, I have friends working at Razorfish.)

Some of these details are discussed on the pages for the individual firms, or in the references. Now that the structure is set up, I have added content to the article to make the notability clear. rhyre (talk) 23:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete completely unwarranted

This article was initially written with third party citations. It is not even eligible for deletion, far less speedy deletion. Leifern (talk) 06:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fast Five (consulting). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]