Talk:Farooq Abdullah

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Farooq Abdullah article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

India: Jammu and Kashmir / Politics High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

NPOV dispute

"Abdullah was a novice in the political arena of Jammu and Kashmir when he was appointed president of the National Conference in August 1981. His main qualification was that he was the son and heir of Sheikh Abdullah" - this appears to be a personal reflection. Even if this was actually true, it is difficult to verify it, unless a suitable source can be found. Ranban282 (talk) 13:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up and additional information

I have, to an extent, cleaned up the article, and broken it up into sections. However, more information is needed on his Chief Ministerial tenure, and the cub-sections in his political career need to be further broken up. Ranban282 (talk) 14:02, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality

Forooq Abdullah is a Kashmiri not Indian. If you can call Arafat an Israili politician, then you may call Farooq Abdullah an Indian one. Ahangarha (talk) 11:34, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ahangarha, Wikipedia is not created by touting personal opinions like this. The Articles on Indian citizenship in the Indian constitution apply to Jammu and Kashmir. All the erstwhile state subjects of Jammu and Kashmir, and their descendants, are Indian citizens. See the page on Article 35A of the Constitution of India. I would appreciate if you can self-revert your edit. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ahangarha, here is the place for you to respond. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:05, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kautilya3, I am sorry for this. I was new in participating in "talk" on pages. Will follow guidelines. Yet, I keep my stand as it is not a personal opinion, but it is the matter of a nation identity which is being systemically denied. I hope we find a solution for it. Wikipedia shouldn't become a blog for sharing personal opinion, but also shouldn't become another propaganda tool in hand of powers who already have power to do what they want. -- Ahangarha (talk) 00:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is written based on reliable sources. Making arguments based on personal views is a waste of time. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What would be considered a reliable source in this case? Tell me so I can share. Ahangarha (talk) 23:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Hindu Genocide in Kashmir

Kautilya3 After using credible references, the paragraph was added on 'The Hindu Genocide' on the page but was removed. Additionally would like to clarify that I did not revert it back 'multiple times' - just once since no reason was given for removal.

Would like to know the reason for removal, so I can contribute better. Also, if you can remove the ARBIPA sanctions alert, since there were credible references hence the revert. Would appreciate if you can share some guidelines in such cases. Vishwasthakkar (talk) 08:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I notice that you were reinstating somebody else's content. But when you do so, it becomes your responsibility. So you need to be sure the content is prorper, especially when it was already reverted once.

There were many things that were wrong with the content.

WP:NEWSORG are only reliable for news, but the content is citing it for history.
Some of them are opinion columns, which can only be attributed. Some of the content is also putting in Wikipedia voice, somebody's opinions (as if they are a fact). See WP:YESPOV.
Northlines is not an established newspaper.
Most of all, whether the exodus of Kashmiri Hindus is a "genocide" is a contentious issue. You need to consult that page and its talk page, also The Kashmir Files for how Wikipedians are treating the issue.

You received an ARBIPA alert because you are dealing with a contentious topic. You need to be aware of all the relevant Wikipedia policies and apply them. Otherwise, you can stay away from such topics. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Farooq Abdullah Official Portrait.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Farooq Abdullah Lok Sabha Portrail.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]