This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Add {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)|class=|importance=|atlanta=|atlanta-importance=}} project banner to Atlanta-related articles to talk pages and assess.
Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances)
1. The image of Fani Willis is oddly cropped, at a strange angle, and has a blurred background. Is there a better image we can use for this? A district attorney should have a recent, publicly available image online that we can use without fear of copyright.
2. The image of Fani Willis and Nikema Williams in the 2020 election influence investigation section is oddly placed. No mention in the article is made of how Fani Willis and Nikema Williams relate to one another, or why this image should be specifically placed within the 2020 election influence investigation section of the article itself. BootsED (talk) 03:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! #2 seems to be solved, but putting that image of Fani Willis as the new infobox image still isn't a great image. I'm not sure if there is another image of Fani Willis we have that could use. A simple headshot would work well, I would imagine. BootsED (talk) 20:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't always have access to the best free images or sometimes have to wait for them to come along. Is the replacement image better than what was there previously? TarnishedPathtalk00:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree the infobox picture is oddly cropped and blurry. I wouldn't mind replacing it if we have access to a better one. I am just not sure if we actually do have any other pictures that don't impede on copyright infringement. MaximusEditor (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the section dealing with teh 2020 electoin interference investiagation it is stated that "In May 2024, the Georgia Court of Appeals agreed to hear an appeal to the ruling, revisiting whether Willis may be allowed to stay on the case". Has there been any progress on this? I ask because I'm in Australia and I don't see the same news as American editors. TarnishedPathtalk00:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good question. The appeals court has scheduled their hearing on this matter for December 5, 2024; they then have until mid-March of next year to issue their ruling. [1] That ruling could be appealed to the Georgia and ultimately to the United States Supreme Court. Any effects the November election would have on the process would be pure speculation at this point. Paris1127 (talk) 02:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi all, for the infobox image what should the best corse of action be. I feel that the most updated photo of Willis is not very good when compared with the other images available on commons. Any thoughts? Yedaman54 (talk) 20:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The image with the blurred background looks weird as the blurring goes right up to her face and makes her hair look funny. The most up to date image, while not perfect, is preferable. TarnishedPathtalk00:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dude she looks like a gremlin in that photo. It also a large amount of motion blur on her hands. The other photo while yes having a blurred background has a clear photo of her face and quite frankly its a less ugly image. Yedaman54 (talk) 02:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a gremlin is your subjective opinion. The blurring of the entire background in the older photo is jarring when all of a sudden her face is in focus. TarnishedPathtalk03:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your opinions of the blurring is also subjective. Look I get you like the photo cause you uploaded it but we need some other opinions on this. Yedaman54 (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that neither photo is perfect. Unfortunately we can't do Fair Use of photos that are under copyright when we have alternative photos available to use that have free use. In this circumstance it's a decision of which of the imperfect photo is better. TarnishedPathtalk01:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=link}