Talk:Fa (philosophy)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Logic / Ethics / Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Article

Article linked below is a good article but it was used here as reference for a historically nonsensical account of Xunzi as the originator of Fa in Legalism. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/xunzi/FourLights (talk) 11:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Xunzi was the teacher of Han Fei, but not the originator of Fa in Chinese Realpolitik/Legalism. The much earlier Shen Dao also uses Fa.FourLights (talk) 11:35, 5 October 2015 (UTC

Xunzi is only the teacher Han Fei mythologicaly, there’s no real evidence of it to my knowledge. I’ll try and remember to import more material here from the Chinese Legalism page, which includes Shen Dao. Feel free to remind me if I don’t know do, I have other pages I need to work on also.FourLights (talk) 22:23, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 June 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 17:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– Most Category:Philosophical concepts use "(philosophy)" and another Chinese philosophy term Jing (philosophy) already does, so this is about maintaining better WP:CONSISTENT titles. On a basic level "(concept)" is far too broad a term to use as a disambiguator. -- Netoholic @ 20:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. DannyS712 (talk) 04:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a question of categorization. I don't know who you'd talk to about this. I can't even get anyone to really review my pages most of the time, unless it's just an off person with a criticism.FourLights (talk)

Support Rreagan007 (talk) 23:53, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.