Talk:Extraterrestrial vortex

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Weather: Space Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Space weather task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2020 and 15 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AlexKueser.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Naming of Article

Don't you think the naming is flawed? Since it's titled Extraterrestrial Cyclones, but half the article talks about Anticyclones. Either we split the article into two articles or change it's name into Extraterrestrial Storms or something. Also, this is a list, so I think the name should be in plural. UltimateDarkloid (talk) 10:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great Dark Spot size

This article describes Neptune's Great Dark Spot as being the size of Eurasia, but the GDS's page describes it as the size of Earth. Which is more accurate? Did the spot change size enough for both of these to be partly-accurate? Apokalyps2547 (talk) 13:53, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]