Talk:Expanded access

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge Compassionate use into Expanded access

Propose merger. Articles are mostly redundant and could easily be merged. The expanded access article is longer with more references and more than just a definition at this time, and 'expanded access' is more encompassing and neutral than 'compassionate use', so it would be easier to merge in the indicated direction. Jethero^Talk 01:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Recind proposal. No debate/dissent ensued in 3 months. Jethero^Talk 23:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Instead, note that the compassionate use article was essentially a copy of a definition from commerical site mederms.com, and then a personal point of veiw interpretation of what that means. I will replace the article with a vocabulary notice and reference to wiktionary, where definitions belong, (though there is not yet a wiktionary definition.) Jethero^Talk 23:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think that your original merge proposal was the right move. Compassionate use should be an automatic redirect to this article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Managed use program here

As with the former Compassionate use article, Managed use program has several issues, and is a fork of this content, so I propose a simple redirect. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 02:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]