Talk:Ewoks (TV series)

Star Wars Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

20th Century Studios Low‑importance

	20th Century Studios portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 20th Century Studios, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 20th Century Studios and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.20th Century StudiosWikipedia:WikiProject 20th Century StudiosTemplate:WikiProject 20th Century Studios20th Century Studios articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of minor Star Wars characters#Logray|Master Logray]] The anchor (#Logray) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Removed character list

That list of characters was just ugly. I didn't think it really benefited the article (most of the links didn't have their own page anyways), so I removed it. --Hotdoglives 02:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about the second series of Ewoks with a new look? This is an image of these series. 88.19.143.36 (talk) 15:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disney XD

Someone keeps adding the Disney XD category into this page and Star Wars: Droids. We don't know for sure if Disney XD will air these shows or not. - FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Star Wars: Ewoks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Star Wars: Ewoks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starwars.com/eu/tv/classic/news20040826.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starwars.com/kids/explore/eu/f20041123/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060215202417/http://www.timelineuniverse.net/CoverGalleries/CovergalleryEwoks.htm to http://www.timelineuniverse.net/CoverGalleries/CovergalleryEwoks.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050828010942/http://www.lucasfan.com/animated/ to http://www.lucasfan.com/animated/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160409183613/http://www.lucasfan.com/swtv/ewdrhistory.html to http://www.lucasfan.com/swtv/ewdrhistory.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 September 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. bd2412 T 00:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars: Ewoks → Ewoks (TV series) – "Star Wars" never appears as part of the title. The series is simply called "Ewoks". UpdateNerd (talk) 21:48, 9 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. bd2412 T 17:47, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The proposed title is a redirect to Ewok and it should be kept as such as that is the primary topic, the race which the TV series is named after. However, if the TV series is indeed not called "Star Wars: Ewoks" then the title should be Ewoks (TV series) (which is already a redirect to it). --Gonnym (talk) 22:45, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you’re right to add the parenthesized disambiguation, but I don’t know how to modify the request. UpdateNerd (talk) 23:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think I was able to change it here. Now I'll try fixing WP:RM version as well. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 03:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - I support this now. Note: The title cards for both S1 and S2 show just "Ewoks" but the article on Starwars.com calls it "Star Wars: Ewoks". --Gonnym (talk) 09:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.126.81.6 (talk) 18:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I note this is reversing a string of undiscussed moves, see discussion. Andrewa (talk) 00:55, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@BD2412: any reason why a discussion with 4 supporters and no opposers was relisted? --Gonnym (talk) 22:57, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- It seems like this has been a contentious issue in the past, and one of the support votes is from an open IP address. I was inclined to close this as moved, but I wouldn't want someone to say that it snuck by them. Keeping this open for another week insures the absence of challenges to the legitimacy of the discussion. bd2412 T 23:20, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good call IMO, of course I'm involved but as a supporter, but a relist is a good investment IMO, see discussion below. Andrewa (talk) 02:11, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'll go ahead and support to move this one along. While some reliable sources refer to the series as Star Wars: Ewoks, for TV series I generally prefer to defer to the show's title card for naming purposes, and the titlecard of this TV show clearly is just "Ewoks". Therefore, I'll go with accuracy over WP:NATURALDIS in this case. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is there evidence that someone typing Ewoks are more likely to be searching for the show over the fictional alien species that Ewoks currently directs to? If there isn't I don't believe that this article should be titled Ewoks.--76.65.40.44 (talk) 00:45, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what's being proposed. UpdateNerd (talk) 01:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ops missread that. I initially thought the reference to WP:NATURALDIS meant thy IJBball wanted the article moved to Ewoks.--76.65.40.44 (talk) 22:58, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

The target history makes interesting reading

22:29, 8 November 2005‎ RussBot (talk | contribs | block)‎ m . . (30 bytes) (-10)‎ . . (Robot: Fixing double-redirect -"Star Wars: Ewoks (cartoon)" +"Star Wars: Ewoks") (rollback: 1 edit | undo)
04:51, 18 October 2005‎ Rayc (talk | contribs | block)‎ m . . (40 bytes) (+11)‎ . . (Fixed double redirect; You can help!) (undo | thank)
08:06, 21 August 2005‎ Adamwankenobi (talk | contribs | block)‎ . . (29 bytes) (+29)‎ . . (Ewoks (TV series) moved to Ewoks (cartoon)) (thank)

which I preserve above. Possibly none of the several previous moves (this shows there have been at least three) were discussed. Hopefully this RM will lead to stability. Andrewa (talk) 00:55, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ewoks (cartoon) is totally incorrect under WP:NCTV! It should certainly never be at that title!! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what the consensus request is for. UpdateNerd (talk) 08:43, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Andrewa (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Hopefully this RM will finally lead to a stable and defensible title! That's one reason for preserving the edit history that will (hopefully) soon be overwritten... it's an important part of the trail that documents these other moves to titles that have been tried and rejected, and should discourage similar bold moves. Although those particular titles are now to some degree salted, I'm often amazed at the new titles editors invent, and the imaginative reasons they (sometimes) give for thinking that these are correct. Andrewa (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Production companies

@AdamDeanHall: I couldn't get my whole comment in the edit summary. Fox didn't produce this show in the 1980s when it was made. Disney just added their logo to the release on streaming (for reasons unknown to me). "Production companies" are those that originally conceived and created the show prior to its original airing. Please explain if that doesn't make sense. UpdateNerd (talk) 03:08, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No Dulok in Clone Wars

Someone inserted a claim that a Dulok is seen in the Clone Wars series. I cannot find any confirmation of this, not even on the Wookieepedia site. 2600:4041:5CCA:2B00:E12D:6135:7B4E:9FBC (talk) 06:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]