Talk:Eve of the Daleks/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TheDoctorWho (talk · contribs) 05:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 22:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC) I'll take this.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Under devolopement "Zooom" should be spelt "Zoom"  Done

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Tell me about "Sanity" and "Thinkbox"

   @OlifanofmrTennant: Sanity is used in the same method that WP:RSPAMAZON would be used. It's simply verifying a non-controversial and undisputed release date. I replaced Thinkbox with BARB. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

   Selected 10 at random sources all check out

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the ytral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Alt text needed for lead image  Done

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: