This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eve of the Daleks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles
Eve of the Daleks is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
I added a sentence on the ratings tab stating that this episode, while highly viewed compared to other programs of the day, is the lowest rated epsiode in the revival of Doctor Who. This is fact, based on actual numbers. The only news story I could find was Daily Mail, but the facts remain the same - so I think the fact should be stated on this page. This is not my personal bias its simply a fact. (Aricmfergie (talk) 05:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Even if it's a fact (as you've stated above four times), which it is, it still requires a source. Unfortunately, Daily Mail cannot be used as a source per WP:RSPSOURCES; see the very clear consensus listed at WP:DAILYMAIL. If it's the only news story, then simply wait until another is available; see WP:NORUSH. There's no rush to add it. -- Alex_21TALK05:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Besides, if you actually read the source, it was posted on 4 January, and thus discusses the overnight ratings, not the consolidated ratings. This thus makes the article false: this episode didn't actually receive the lowest overnight ratings since the programme's revival in 2005; "The Eaters of Light" received 2.89M overnight viewers, as compared to the 3.21M overnight viewers this episode received, which is the rating that the Daily Mail discusses. I would recommend actually reading what you add; the Daily Mail is anything but "fact". -- Alex_21TALK05:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
b (inline citations to reliable sources): 
Done
