This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Daily page views
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
A series of "50/50" results have been added to the split tables for each show on this and several other articles. I removed these as they appear to be unsourced, the methodology used to compile these figures is unexplained, and it is for a voting system which was not used at the time of the contest. I therefore believe this would fall under WP:INDISCRIMINATE, specifically for the point on "Excessive listings of unexplained statistics." @Martinevans123:, as you reverted my edits to remove these figures, are you able to provide further context on why these should remain? Sims2aholic8 (talk) 22:55, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sims2aholic8, your edit summary was "there is no encyclopaedic value in including results of a different voting system which is no longer in use". Did you actually mean "there is no encyclopaedic value in including results of a different voting system which was not in use at that time"? I certainly have no other sources. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:59, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Martinevans123: In this case both of those statements are valid, as the mixed voting system for which the additional details were added has not been used since 2015, but yes to be specific the system was not in use at the time of the contest so my edit summary should have referenced as such. As my original point explained, and has also be raised on the 2021 contest talk page, there are several reasons for the exclusion of these figures, so I will remove these again. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 23:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
