Talk:Europe Elects

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 December 2019 by reviewer Bkissin (talk · contribs).

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

European Union

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hi, the articles relevance is given. The German article already exists[1], written by this author. Help and feedback are welcome! Thank you for your efforts.--Stubenviech (talk) 20:48, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New try

Hi, I added a citation. I think it is ok now. In case more citations are required, please check here [2].Stubenviech (talk) 14:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AngusWOOF, which source would you recommend, so that the article can be reviewed? Thanks for your help.Stubenviech (talk) 17:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stubenviech, I would suggest more external news sources that are not directly related to the company. Any mainstream newspapers? The europeelects.eu/press is still a primary source (own website). AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Like you have seen under the link, the CNN, Euronews and many more are quoting Europe Elects. The source I added says, that it is popular among Members of the European Parliament. Even more popular than CNN. What can I add to make this definitely relevant article ready for the en.wikipedia? Stubenviech (talk) 21:41, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stubenviech, where are those CNN and Euronews articles that discuss Europe Elects? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:04, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just look at the link, which I posted first in this threat. On this page are many sources. Thanks for coming back to me. Do you need more? Stubenviech (talk) 23:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, it shouldn't come from their website's press section. They should be independently found and posted as separate references. That way it's not biased towards only the good image press. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Next Try

Bkissin, where is the article missing neutrality? Thank you for your help.--Stubenviech (talk) 07:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I almost accepted it too! I looked at the section on Profile and the voice that the article was using sounded like that of the company, rather than an encyclopedia writing neutrally of a subject. Like, it sounded like something you'd see on Europe Elects website "It is the main idea of this project...". Be even more detached from the subject matter. Look at how other polling companies with articles are written and see if you can replicate that format. I don't want to feed lines to you, but for that "It is the main idea of this project..." line, I would go with something along the lines of "The organization does polling in a number of countries (or all EU member states, whichever is correct) and releases its results for public consumption." (Don't use that verbatim, but tweak it). Bkissin (talk) 13:22, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bkissin Thanks a lot for your help! I did an update. Do you think, that it is ok like this? Btw it is not a commercial company and I am not involved, (except from consuming the results ;-) ).--Stubenviech (talk) 08:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

I made a new try Bkissin, AngusWOOF and improved the mentioned points. Do you think, it is ok by now? Have I moved it into the right place? Thank you for your efforts.--Stubenviech (talk) 13:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]