Talk:Eudicots
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eudicots article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
How can Berberidopsidaceae be an 'unplaced' family
[edit]when below you also have the order Berberidopsidiales? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 16:45, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Very good question. The answer seems to be that the cladogram at the top of Eudicots#Subdivisions is based on the APG III system, whereas the list below is based on the APG II system. Clearly this needs to be fixed. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:27, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks!
Move undone
[edit]Some time ago, the page was moved from "Eudicots" to "Eudicotyledon".
- No consensus was established for the move; this should have been raised here and at WT:PLANTS.
- The term used in the APG system, the basis of flowering plant classification in the English Wikipedia, is "eudicots".
- Google searches, for what they are worth, show about 8,900 hits for "eudicotyledon" and 1,190,000 for "eudicots", so the WP:COMMONNAME is clearly "eudicots".
I've undone the move. Restoring it requires consensus first. Peter coxhead (talk) 14:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)