Talk:Eucalyptus rubida
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have just created this. Need to check some books tonight to confirm & expand a few details. Could someone verify the Sieber ex. Spreng binomial bit? (Left it in during paste from another page - probably correct but not certain).
The note about firewood is original research. Alexander110 04:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your contribution! I've gone ahead and changed the binomial authority per the APNI, which lists H.Deane & Maiden as the authority. I've also removed your mention of its use as firewood. Unless you can cite a source that notes it's usefulness (or lack thereof) as firewood, it's original research, as you noted, and should not be included in the article. Cheers, --Rkitko (talk) 04:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class plant articles
- Mid-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class New South Wales articles
- Low-importance New South Wales articles
- WikiProject New South Wales articles
- Start-Class Tasmania articles
- Low-importance Tasmania articles
- WikiProject Tasmania articles
- Start-Class Victoria articles
- Low-importance Victoria articles
- WikiProject Victoria articles
- Start-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles