Talk:Eucalyptus leucophloia

Australia: Northern Territory / Queensland / Western Australia / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Eucalyptus leucophloia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland, or the State Library of Western Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Incorrect etymology

@Hughesdarren, please check your source again for following part: The species name leucophloia is taken from the Greek words, leukos meaning white and phloeos meaning bark, in reference to the light coloured bark. Bark is actually phloios (φλοιός) in ancient Greek. Interesting to note is that Euclid states: leucophloia: Greek leuco-, white and phloios, the bark., which correctly translitterates φλοιός as phloios, but errs by translitterating Greek kappa with c in leuco- (from λευκός). Wimpus (talk) 14:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But according to these entries of Euclid, bark is phloia (see here, here, here, here, here and here) in ancient Greek ... Wimpus (talk) 14:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked this myself, see here and it seems that this etymological mistake is in this book. Within the limited number of pages you can search in Google Books, you can find, that five times phloios is actually used. Wimpus (talk) 17:46, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]