Talk:Eucalyptus deanei

A fact from Eucalyptus deanei appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 March 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the tallest specimens of Eucalyptus deanei (pictured) are over 70 m (230 ft) high?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eucalyptus deanei.

Wikipedia

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Eucalyptus deanei is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Notable specimens

An editor has called into question the height of a tree in Blue Gum Forest here. The quoted height (65m) and trunk diameter (6m) are in the book cited. It may be possible to view the page here. I have removed the word "allegedly" and the tag "dubious". Any contrary claim about the tree's height needs a published reference. Gderrin (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]