Talk:Ethernet over twisted pair
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ethernet over twisted pair article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removed Redirection Notice
[edit]I have removed the label at the top that states "RJ45" redirects here. For the generic 8P8C modular connector, see 8P8C. For the Registered Jack (RJ) wiring standard, see Registered jack.
Reason: The RJ45 article does not redirect here. CraigMatthews 01:12, 12 Dec 2009 (UTC)
Rename/move to Ethernet over twisted-pair
[edit]@Burt Harris: IMHO, that move is in error. "Twisted-pair" is a compound adjective that requires a noun, so it should be either "Ethernet over twisted pair" or "Ethernet over twisted-pair cabling". --Zac67 (talk) 07:41, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Zac67 is correct. See Compound modifier. ~Kvng (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Cat 7
[edit]Why it does not have the Cat7 in comparison table? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daya Kathir (talk • contribs) 12:17, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Daya Kathir: Please try to use the New section feature on top to create a new topic section. Cat 7 isn't listed because there's no Ethernet-over-twisted-pair variant that requires it – it's backwards compatible with Cat 6 but not with Cat 6A. Cat 7 was intended for 10GBASE-T but requires special/exotic termination while the somewhat younger Cat 6A doesn't. Also, Cat 7 is popular in Europe and other countries but virtually non-existent in the US. --Zac67 (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Probable Error in the table
[edit]Hello all.
I beleive that in table "Comparison of twisted-pair-based Ethernet physical transport layers (TP-PHYs)"
There is maybe a mistake: 100BASE-T1 -> Encoding = 4B3B -> I beleive it's 4B3T
Best regards Haarkon (talk) 09:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- IEEE 802.3 calls that "4B/3B", even if it uses ternary symbols – see clause 96.3.3. --Zac67 (talk) 12:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
link from note is dead
[edit]Note #23 leads to a deadlink
"New 802.3bw Ethernet Auto Standard Leaves LVDS Cables in the Dust". 8 April 2016. 147.161.185.105 (talk) 13:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- C-Class Computer networking articles
- High-importance Computer networking articles
- C-Class Computer networking articles of High-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- C-Class electronic articles
- Low-importance electronic articles
- WikiProject Electronics articles
- C-Class Telecommunications articles
- Mid-importance Telecommunications articles