Talk:Eternit
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (May 2010) |
First trial to be more factual
[edit]I have tried to remove as much as possible of the advertising style for Eternit or for fibre cement. However, it can certainly still be continued. Although there is nothing bad to support the free enterprise and the open market, the initial tone of this page was inappropriate for an encyclopedic material requiring to be more neutral and factual. Wikification is also improved now: I removed the tag requesting more inner Wiki links. Cheers, Shinkolobwe (talk) 11:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Merge into Fiber cement
[edit]I do not see any reason why a brand name (such as Eternit or Fibro) should receive a special page. --Zeamays (talk) 03:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- A pretty notable brand in Italy, though. Massive problems of pollution and industrial diseases (in Casale Monferrato in particular) and subject to an on-going maxi-trial in Turin. Ian Spackman (talk) 04:08, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- That info can still be included. The brand name would still be findable using a search. Mostly brand names don't warrant Wikipedia articles separate for the main article. --Zeamays (talk) 16:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, given the current state of the article, I think that a merge and redirect may well be the right thing to do now. The principal problem in doing this, I think, is that the current article on fiber cement (or rather its redirect target, Fiber cement siding) is about an asbestos-free replacement for Eternit and Fibro: we would have to show that the term fiber cement is actually used to refer to the asbestos-based materials, and that all Eternit based products are properly called ‘siding’. A search through the interwikis for the current article does, however, throw up a fair number of notable companies with ‘Eternit’ as part of their name, and when one or more of those has been written up as an article Eternit should probably become a dab page. Ian Spackman (talk) 02:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'll start working on a page for Eternit the global company, now that the trial in italy is completed. DAB then is a good idea.Saltwolf (talk) 18:42, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, given the current state of the article, I think that a merge and redirect may well be the right thing to do now. The principal problem in doing this, I think, is that the current article on fiber cement (or rather its redirect target, Fiber cement siding) is about an asbestos-free replacement for Eternit and Fibro: we would have to show that the term fiber cement is actually used to refer to the asbestos-based materials, and that all Eternit based products are properly called ‘siding’. A search through the interwikis for the current article does, however, throw up a fair number of notable companies with ‘Eternit’ as part of their name, and when one or more of those has been written up as an article Eternit should probably become a dab page. Ian Spackman (talk) 02:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- That info can still be included. The brand name would still be findable using a search. Mostly brand names don't warrant Wikipedia articles separate for the main article. --Zeamays (talk) 16:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
The current version of the article is almost word by word the same as the article for Fiber cement; in its current form it does not deserve a separate article. --Lambiam 18:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
wrong fact - "prohibited in the 1970's"
[edit]The use of asbestos - which is a prominent component in the asbestos+cement mixture widely known as eternit - was gradually prohibited for building materials: European Union - 2002, Hungary - 2005. Nevertheless in the 2009 year the world asbestos mining produced 2 million tons (most of it in Russia and China). Canadian asbestos mines' final close down occured in 2011. Yes, certain uses and products became gradually abandoned starting from the 1970's, but large scale asbestos use in building materials did not stop untill the beginning of 21st century. As of 2014, according to this (http://magyarnarancs.hu/tudomany/halalos-szalirany-92825) article, asbestos use and trade is legal in the US. Harmful properties of asbestos first became widely publicized after 1924 death of Nellie Kershaw, and from the 1930's medical research proved asbestos unsuitable for use in populated areas. During the 1980's half of asbeestos trade and production enterprises closed down. 80.98.114.70 (talk) 12:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eternit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091102061754/http://www.infolink.com.au/c/James-Hardie/Tell-me-more-about-Fibre-Cement-n755412 to http://www.infolink.com.au/c/James-Hardie/Tell-me-more-about-Fibre-Cement-n755412
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
weasel words
[edit]material description section last sentence: " It is primarily due to its function, performance and commercial value.[2]" is it a coomercial?? 89.134.199.32 (talk) 19:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC).
ok, so i be bold and delete this particular useless sentence which is void of information and makes unverifiable claims in weasel words. 89.134.199.32 (talk) 19:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
other common use
[edit]housing waste-water pipes connected to the public sever system were typically made from a concrete-like material called eternit, during the 1950's and probably also before that at least in hungary and probably in other countries in the region as well. it is probably the same material as described in the article.
- more: while inside buildings water pipes (both incoming and out going) are typically made from lead during the mentioned period, the final (large diameter, rather horizontally layed, basement level pipe under the ground connecting the house to the public sever system under the street) section of the waste water plumbing was made from eternit.89.134.199.32 (talk) 20:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)