Talk:Essential medicines policies
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
{{unbalanced}}
[edit]The article approaches the subject with two inbuilt assumptions:
- [subject] is inherently good
- Sri Lanka is perfect (Seriously, nothing is given to suggest that their policy or version of it has had any problems, needed revisions, anything)
It's also written like "Whig history": this thing is inevitable and is the natural result of history. 150.250.43.209 (talk) 21:51, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 30 March 2015
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 11:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
National pharmaceuticals policy → Essential medicines policies – "National pharmaceutical policies" can be anything. The generic term internationally doesn't represent a specific type of policies. The policies described in this articles however more or less constitute Essential medicines policies as defined by the WHO. Of course, better proposals are welcome. PanchoS (talk) 12:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support – Reasonable and well-thought proposal. RGloucester — ☎ 05:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Essential medicines policies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041223192702/http://r0.unctad.org/en/pressref/stdissue.htm to http://r0.unctad.org/en/pressref/stdissue.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930022246/http://www.dailynews.lk/2002/09/30/fea01.html to http://www.dailynews.lk/2002/09/30/fea01.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050219212349/http://www.dailymirror.lk/inside/health/021108.html to http://dailymirror.lk/inside/health/021108.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060625221517/http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/1A29C051-DE36-4521-AB7B-812E8274456D/0/03SriLanka2A1.pdf to http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/1A29C051-DE36-4521-AB7B-812E8274456D/0/03SriLanka2A1.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)