Talk:Essence–energies distinction (version 2)

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 23 February 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Christianity: Theology / Eastern O. Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by theology work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy (assessed as Mid-importance).

Archives

Archive 1

Forking of this article

OK... per the discussion at Talk:Essence–Energies distinction (Eastern Orthodox theology), I have created a content fork so that we now have the article Essence–Energies distinction (Eastern Orthodox theology) which is intended to focus on the Eastern Orthodox view of the distinction and this article which is intended to cover the views of the distinction from other perspectives including non-religious philosophical sources (e.g. the Greek philosophers).

I have to admit that, as I was creating the content fork, I was struck by the fact that there is not currently enough difference between the two articles to warrant making this split. However, I went ahead with the split on the assumption that there would eventually be enough material to justify having done this. Fortunately, very little in Wikipedia is irreversible so, if it turns out this is a bad idea, we can always undo it. If it starts looking like it's not working, just say so and we can discuss going back to having a single article again.

--Pseudo-Richard (talk) 15:40, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CFORK. Content forks are to be avoided even by accident, and making them on purpose under these conditions is definitely wrong. I know there is a lot of stress about subjects to do with Orthodox theology, and difficulties to get consensus, but this level of failure is not really acceptable to the Wikipedia principles and really they should be re-merged.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GOCEreviewed

I have marked this as {{GOCEreviewed}} and removed the copy edit tag from the page because of the merge proposal and the extensive debate on that article's talk page. It's only worth copy editing when the content is reasonably stable. I have done the same at the other article. This is obviously a significant topic, so once these issues have been resolved, please do tag for copy edit once more if it's still wanted. --Stfg (talk) 11:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Essence–energies distinction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130306113628/http://www.vatican.va:80/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merged to Essence–energies distinction (Eastern Orthodox theology)

I've merged the contents of this page to Essence–energies distinction (Eastern Orthodox theology), per Talk:Essence–energies distinction (Eastern Orthodox theology)#Duplicate articles: merger & move-proposal & WP:BOLD. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:16, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]