This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:32, November 4, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Following the Wiki precept "Be Bold" I am removing the unsubstantiated comment "His legacy is still uncertain, with some considering him a pioneer and others a fraud" I have read three biographical articles on Fenollosa in mainstream reference Works: "Dictionary of Art"; "Dictionary of American Biogarphy"; and "American National Biography". I have found no suggestion that he or his work was considered fraudulent. It may be that some individual at some time has made the charge, but if so it does not appear to be a consensus opinion.--Meb5318:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He's acknowledged in the preface of Dow's Composition [7th ed, pgs 4,5]. Where he's described as a "philosopher and logician." The author also refers to him as "imperial art commissioner for the Japanese government."
sPAzzMatiC 03:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Ernest Fenollosa's history of chinese and japanese art
