Talk:Eric Anderson (sociologist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia / Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles / San Francisco Bay Area / Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Athletics Low‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Men's Issues

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Men's Issues articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Too self-serving

I have edited this down because it was too-self-serving. The article read like a cv or a job application! Not an objective record of someone's contribution to academic knowledge.

I have also included references to Mark Simpson's work which has been acknowledged as influencing Anderson. It would be good to have more external links to places where Anderson's contribution to knowledge has been noted too.

NotoriousQRG 21:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi someone removed the section I added referencing the influence of Mark Simpson's theories of metrosexual masculinity on Anderson's work. I think this is important and valid, because it shows how Anderson's work fits into a wider context. It has not appeared out of nowhere!

If anyone objects please could they say why here? Thanks

NotoriousQRG NotoriousQRG (talk) 15:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yes, I did this. In the editing of this, people should be aware that NotoriousQRG appears to be obsessed by Mark Simpsons theories. What she is arguing is her own perspective, rather than one advocated by academics, journalists or even Mark Simpson. Evidence of this can be found at this blog site: Mudshake (talk) 16:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)Mudshake I have removed the link to that blogpost because it contains personal data about me, which seems unfair. NotoriousQRG NotoriousQRG (talk) 22:36, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep deleting the reference to Eric Anderson's latest book, 'The Monogamy Gap'. It is published with a top tier publishers (Oxford University Press), and has received a great deal of media attention. Deleting it supports the notion that this is motivated by animus and not objective representation of reality. Mudshake (talk) 20:57, 31 March 2012 (UTC)Mudshake There is a reference to it in the publications section already. The book has not been out very long there is not enough evidence of its importance yet. It is too recent. Are you Eric Anderson? NotoriousQRG NotoriousQRG (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify what you mean by there being enough evidence of its importance. It is clearly a significant component of Anderson's research output, and given it's publicity it (GMTV, Washington Post, Psychology Today etc), it has already had a social impact. Are you arguing that anything 'recent' shouldn't be on wikipedia? I am not Eric Anderson -- The only reason I state that is to make clear I am abiding by wikipedia terms and conditions. Mudshake (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)mudshake[reply]

How do you know Eric? I have put it back at the end of the career section as it is the last thing Eric (who may or may not be you) published. The bit about the research on men students kissing flows well into the bit about Mark Simpson's theories and Eric's comments to Simpson about that research. NotoriousQRG NotoriousQRG (talk) 21:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know all about my relationship with mark Simpson as you have posted the blogpost about it. I don't think you need to add the bit about the media attention - as you can see I have said this page is already too 'self-serving' and it is. NotoriousQRG NotoriousQRG (talk) 21:28, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I will re-add the bit about it receiving media attention and providing public debate (a vital part of academic work). Why do you assert that I know Eric Anderson? I haven't questioned your relationship with Mark Simpson - perhaps you would like to expand on that relationship? Mudshake (talk) 21:26, 31 March 2012 (UTC)mudshake[reply]

The issue is though that it is your assertion that the page is too self-serving. Please explain why you don't think something about media attention is relevant. Mudshake (talk) 21:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)mudshake[reply]

because most books get 'media attention' it is called publicity. and I think you are either Eric Anderson, his husband, or Mark Mccormack. NotoriousQRG NotoriousQRG (talk) 21:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eric Anderson (sociologist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]