Talk:Erechtheion
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Erechtheion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article is written like an essay
[edit]This article in general (but particularly the text under the 'Cult objects' heading) does not conform to WP:NOTESSAY, WP:TONE, and WP:PRONOUNS. "If we are to try to discern..." or "[t]hen there is the problem of the identity of the korai" are instances of the unencyclopedic, relativistic tone that this entire article seems to take in attempting to reflect a variety of scholarly opinions on the subject matter. This could surely be done without the article itself sounding like a meta-commentary or a literature review. yaguzi (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
What materials is The Erectheion made of? What factors have affected the choice of materials
[edit]q.qqq..aaa. 31.217.179.24 (talk) 16:46, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Architecture articles
- Mid-importance Architecture articles
- B-Class Greek articles
- Low-importance Greek articles
- Athens task force articles
- WikiProject Greece general articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages
- B-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- B-Class Archaeology articles
- Low-importance Archaeology articles
- B-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles