Talk:Equus alaskae
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Equus alaskae be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Why merge?
[edit]Hey Montanabw, I see that you have suggested to merge this article with Equus conversidens- what were your justifications, may I ask? I have found more recent sources, as listed, which not only justify Equus alaskae, but even list Equus conversidens as a synonym of E. alaskae. Due to the contentious nature of equiid palaeontology in the Americas, I would consider both articles as legitimate. SuperTah (talk) 02:15, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- My position is that if they are the same species or subspecies, there should only be one article. I have no strong views on which title it should be, though it appears that some of the mexicanus subspecies might also be listed as conversidens. I am aware that there is a lot of disagreement, but content forks don't help. At a minimum, if the articles are not merged, then the controversy should be mentioned with a cross-link to the other article. Montanabw(talk) 23:20, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class equine articles
- Low-importance equine articles
- Wikipedia requested images of horses
- WikiProject Equine articles
- Stub-Class mammal articles
- Low-importance mammal articles
- Wikipedia requested images of mammals
- WikiProject Mammals articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- Wikipedia requested images of palaeontology
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles