Talk:Epistemic modal logic

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

weak

Epistemic modal logic is so weak, can anyone find a justification for it? It seems so screwed it isn't even worth mentioning. I'll even count a vague endorsement by some contemporary logician. Just give me something--Heyitspeter (talk) 11:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently Jaakko Hintikka does work on this.--Heyitspeter (talk) 04:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Negative introspection axiom

In the article, the english description doesn't seem to fit the formal definition ... there seems to be a K missing. 92.230.66.116 (talk) 11:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

problems-section

the citation source for No 3 is no longer there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.172.165.48 (talk) 11:44, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]