Jump to content

Talk:Epidemiology of diabetes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Epidemiology ENPH 450

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2022 and 17 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Brooklynfedie (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Schmidtj5997.

— Assignment last updated by Schmidtj5997 (talk) 17:07, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chowdhury et al. 2016

[edit]

@Axad12: What was wrong with the paragraph about diabetes being higher in Métis and First Nations people? At first glance, it looks pretty okay to me. Snowman304|talk 21:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The editor who included that section did it as part of a self-citing spamming campaign effecting a number of articles (see their contribution history here [1]).
Their only purpose on Wikipedia seems to have been citing the work of a particular group of academics, one of whom presumably is the user themself. This is contrary to policy so I have removed all of the offending material. Axad12 (talk) 21:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, with the benefit of hindsight I removed the wrong section/reference. I will amend now. Axad12 (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That totally makes sense. I figured you had a reason. Snowman304|talk 22:07, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. If they add any further self-citing material I will again remove it and then take the necessary action to get them blocked. Axad12 (talk) 22:13, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]