Talk:Environmental issues in the Niger Delta

Nigeria Top‑importance

	Nigeria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NigeriaWikipedia:WikiProject NigeriaTemplate:WikiProject NigeriaNigeria articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa Top‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Google maps image

I think this link shows how flares in the Niger Delta can be seen from space. Can someone confirm this? It might be cool to include such an image in the article, or at least a link to one:

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=niger+delta&sll=3.57373,8.247986&sspn=1.885889,2.268677&ie=UTF8&ll=4.758467,7.989807&spn=0.941557,1.134338&t=h&z=10&om=1

Preceding unsigned comment by User:Ryguasu (talk), July 2007

Do you mean the white fluffy things? I think those are clouds. They try to avoid them, of course, but sometimes it's not possible, or not worth buying new images. Thomas Kluyver (talk) 00:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gas flaring, POV

I tagged this section as being POV (Point of View, i.e. not neutral). If you're angrily reading this, let me explain that I'm not trying to judge whether or not it's correct, just that it's not written in a suitable way for an encyclopaedia. Phrases like "As a result, little is done by the oil companies" are definitely in need of some sort of back up--preferably statistics from reliable sources. In that specific case (please consider this as an example, not a particular argument), a source from Shell [1] says that they have "invested $3 billion" and "reduced associated gas flaring by more than 30%". If you want to dispute that, you need (up to date) evidence. As for phrases like "However, this statistic is accepted by few."... I hope you can see why this isn't neutral. Leave it out, and just give the specific claims and counterclaims that have been made. Even that is topped, however, by the final sentence: "Shell as a corporation has not publicly admitted fault nor made amends to the broader world community for its perpetration of these atrocities and its executives continue to enjoy extremely high salaries and luxurious lifestyles around the world." That was so unencyclopaedic that I've just got rid of it. If you believe it belongs in the article, please discuss it here. Thomas Kluyver (talk) 23:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The section contained POV language and I tried to remedy this and removed the POV tag; some citation requests were placed. Ekem (talk) 14:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.nigeria-planet.com/Oil-And-Nigeria2.html
Triggered by \bnigeria-planet\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:11, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Environmental issues in the Niger Delta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070311011929/http://www.africanconservation.org:80/ncftemp/nipa.html to http://www.africanconservation.org/ncftemp/nipa.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]