Talk:English irregular verbs

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

English Language

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Untitled

Someone more qualified to discuss this than me should mention that many (I suppose most) irregular verbs in English were once regular verbs in Old English, and they have inherited the sound changes from their Old English conjugations. Bugloaf (talk) 13:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. It is technically incorrect to refer to strong verbs as irregular verbs in English. True "irregular" verbs in English, in the sense of being "anomalous", are verbs like "go" or "do", which are neither weak nor strong. I suggest that a professional linguist review this article. 161.24.19.44 (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rename page?

There aren't really "irregular" verbs, except perhaps be. There's strong verbs (all seven classes), dental preterites, and the anomalous do, go, and grammaticalized will. This page probably could do with a rewrite. Irbisgreif (talk) 17:59, 27 September 2009 (UTC) sa;ls,k';qa5eqsa03d5a4q+3d69a5q +98+65.3 Fukken agree with you there, man. 81.191.68.231 (talk) 14:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tyhtyhghsdfhrty — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.243.9.129 (talk) 15:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]