Talk:Energy shot

This page is about energy shots, not vitamin energy shots so I think some of the references to specific products produced by RuckSack sound like advertising. Continued references to the difference between energy shots and vitamin energy shots is not needed on this page particularly because the product with 90% of the energy shot market is a vitamin based energy shot. I have not made these changes but pass on this suggestion and welcome dialogue on this topic.Melanie Grimes 19:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
I agree with the above sentiment, and pay special care to the "External Links," which are all different brands I have not heard. The section should just be deleted. Radarbacon (talk) 05:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have been researching and am prepared to edit this wiki, but I am new to this and would like advice because changed I made previously were reversed and deleted. I propose deleting the EXTERNAL LINKS section, as suggested, and broadening topic in general. P propose deleting all information relating to VITAMIN ENERGY SHOTS, and suggest starting a new wiki on that topic. I suggest the following HEADERS

Definition of an energy shot (references from BEVNET) History of energy shots (references from Forbes, bevnet) Ingredients Nutrition research

Please advise. Melanie Grimes 14:29, 9 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melapatella (talk • contribs)

Add to History

Maybe we should also mention that Krating Daeng (which is what Austrian businessman Dietrich Mateschitz, in partnership with the drink's original Thai inventor Chaleo Yoovidhya, modified and brought to European markets as Red Bull) is sold in bottles of similar size to an "energy shot" (like its predecessors Lipovitan and Bacchus-F — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.176.4.161 (talk) 06:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Energy shot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081120184728/http://www.bevspectrum.com/issue/SpectumMarch2008/2008EnergyDrink to http://www.bevspectrum.com/issue/SpectumMarch2008/2008EnergyDrink

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Energy shot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]