User talk:Melapatella

File source problem with File:Manoj74.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Manoj74.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 00:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Manoj Bhargava.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sumitkumarjha75 (talk) 15:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Manoj Bhargava.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! B music ian 07:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Melapatella. You have new messages at Bmusician's talk page.
Message added 13:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

B music ian 13:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Manoj Bhargava, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

:- ) DCS 20:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

5-Hour Energy

It's fairly obvious from your contributions that you have a very favorable opinion of 5-Hour energy and its owners, which is fine - but your cause would probably be best served if you worked to keep a neutral tone. You can quote somebody else saying something about 5-Hour Energy, if it's appropriate, but you can't write a paragraph in the article that says that thing itself. ~ Josh "Duff Man" (talk) 20:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have cited all of my additions based on articles in Forbes and Crains. I am writing neutral but positive pieces, as I understand that to be the position on wikipedia. I thought some of the previous content was off topic and the data conflicted with the media reports, specifically that 5-Hour invented the idea of energy shots. This has been well-documented in many journal articles, such as Crains, BevMart and Forbes.Melanie Grimes 21:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Melapatella. You have new messages at WP:REFUND.
Message added 18:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Melapatella, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 05:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Deborah Taj Anapol

Hi Melanie, I've moved your submission to the correct place. Callanecc (talk) 13:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Deborah Anapol, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Callanecc (talk) 13:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You've got a response at the Teahouse!

Hello, Melapatella. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by McDoob AU 93 16:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Melapatella. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ryan Vesey Review me! 16:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leo Kornfeld.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 15:28, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Manoj Bhargava.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Manoj Bhargava.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:43, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leo Kornfeld concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leo Kornfeld, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:52, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Manoj Bhargava.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Manoj Bhargava.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Manoj bhargava.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Manoj bhargava.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 21:29, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leo Kornfeld (September 30)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leo Kornfeld.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 02:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Melapatella

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Melapatella, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drchriswilliams (talk) 23:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... I am not the editor of the pages for Manoj Barghava or 5 hour energy and have not made any additions for over one or two years. I started the page and other people have been editing it and I don't know who they are.

Melanie Grimes 00:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Melanie, It was your user page that I had nominated for speedy deletion. The disclosures on the page set out your background, which some editors might find helpful. Unfortunately on your userspace this information was written in the third party and as such could be judged to appear as a WP:FAKEARTICLE. There is more information at WP:UPYES about how adding a template could be another way of avoiding confusion on a userpage. Drchriswilliams (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about that. I am a professional writer but am not that active on wikipedia. I'm really proud to be a writer here and will be very happy to quickly update my user page and fix the errors. I am currently away from my office and have limited internet access. How long do you think you all could give me to repair this problem? MelanieMelanie Grimes 13:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

The userpage has already been deleted. This doesn't affect your ability to contribute to Wikipedia. Rather than ask for an old version to be restored, you may find it more straightforward to simply create a new user page with up-to-date profile information. Drchriswilliams (talk) 16:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Bastyr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Bastyr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bastyr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Delta13C (talk) 07:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Manoj Wiki.jpg

The file File:Manoj Wiki.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]