Talk:Energy in South Australia

Australia: South Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Energy in South Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electricity prices

I removed reference to a Productivity Commission report (http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/109921/13-carbon-prices-appendixd.pdf) and text concluding on the basis of this that SA has third highest electricity prices relative to other states. While the report provides data on wholesale prices, there is no text that I could find that makes a conclusion about what SA prices are relative to other states. A bit of Googling quickly leads to the conclusion that, as far as SA consumers are concerned, SA has the highest retail prices in the country. I suggest that text about SA electricity prices should be clear about whether they are wholesale or retail prices, and that sources be used which articulate conclusions about prices in the text rather than just present data. Landscape goats (talk) 23:54, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

This article only talks about renewable energy. Either it should be renamed 'renewable energy in South Australia', or it should provide more discussion on conventional energy sources such as coal, oil and gas etc., which still supply the vast majority of the state's demand. I suggest at least something along the lines of the following: the history of energy use and consumption, a summary of the known resources, distribution and retail, export, consumption (both domestic and significant industrial users), policy and regulation, current and future directions. Landscape goats (talk) 14:09, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Energy in Queensland may also provide some ideas. It definitely needs to be more comprehensive. - Shiftchange (talk) 15:50, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Mess

This article was a mess. I'm about halfway through turning it into something salvagable. Editors should understand the difference between writing a PR brochure for private industry or public bureaucracy and writing an encyclopedia article. Redundant, irrelevant, and inappropriate material will be trimmed without mercy. The article is still too long given the topic, and lacks both focus and precision -- but its much better than it was. --BenJonson (talk) 23:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edits completed.--BenJonson (talk) 14:46, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how much got done (see above) but I've taken the liberty of excising two statements, the first of which used a secondary source as reference (a tabloid newspaper article) and the second being altogether unreferenced. I've replaced them with some sound information from a proper source, which I have referenced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.55.157.82 (talk) 07:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of neutrality

This article is an exercise in shameless self promotion with little in the way of factual content.

Cjmicik (talk) 10:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Energy in South Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724101803/http://www.climatechange.sa.gov.au/index.php?page=renewable-energy-in-sa to http://www.climatechange.sa.gov.au/index.php?page=renewable-energy-in-sa

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Energy in South Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected Renewable Energy in South Australia

I've blank-and-redirected Renewable energy in South Australia to this article. While this article has its own problems, it is in a much better place, and holds more value than the other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caboose221 (talk • contribs) 13:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Interconnector

This article seems to suggest there's only 1 interconnector to VIC. What about Murraylink https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murraylink ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.200.106.106 (talk) 15:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]