Jump to content

Talk:Energy Tax Act

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment/question

[edit]
  • User Comment: perhaps the gas guzler tax needs a page of its own with specific tax info.
  • User Question: What is the gas guzzler tax based on EPA wise? Is it based on the highway rating, city rating, or the two averaged?
The article now answers the second question; it's a weighted average. As for the first question, Wikipedia does not make value judgements. -- Beland 21:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious 1973 claim

[edit]

The article claims this 1979 law was in response to the 1973 energy crisis, not the 1979 energy crisis one. What evidence is there for that? -- Beland 21:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this report: Lazzari, Salvatore; "Energy Tax Policy", Congressional Research Service of The Library of Congress, Updated April 22, 2005; page 6. -- Thanks, CZmarlin 23:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion request

[edit]

What portions of this law are still in effect? Did they have an expiration date? -- Beland 21:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

time travel?

[edit]

The article states that an act passed in 1978 was in response to the 1979 Iranian revolution. Was it perhaps in response to the unrest that led up to the revolution, or was the revolution irrelevant? LachlanA 17:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

6,000 pound limit

[edit]

Is the 6,000 pound limit for a vehicle's empty weight or it's gross vehicle weight? These numbers differ wildly as a gross vehicle weight is the maximum weight of the vehicle, passengers, cargo, and trailer allowable. The reason I ask is that the claim about the 6,000 pound limit encouraging the use of SUVs is almost entirely inaccurate if it refers to empty weight. The only trucks/SUVs I can think of that are over 3 tons are the Hummer H1 and H2, and probably the higher Ford SuperDuty series. I can't think of any passenger cars at all weighing that much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.9.205.47 (talk) 00:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Formula inaccurate?

[edit]

Either I'm missing something or the formula listed for "Uncorrected MPG" is wrong. I'm not sure what that formula is supposed to represent, but when I input the MPG ratings for my car (16 city, 21 highway), it gave me a result that was higher than either of my two inputs (result was 21.14). Is the formula wrong or am I just misinterpreting what it means? I know it says "Uncorrected," but I don't understand why it would give me a number outside the range of the two inputs. The article implies that the uncorrected MPG would just be the overall combined MPG resulting from 55% city and 45% highway driving, which I think would be 1/(.55/CityMPG + .45/HighwayMPG). For my vehicle, that would give a result of 17.92 MPG combined. Am I wrong here? Can someone provide a source for the equation currently listed? I may be looking in all the wrong places, but I can't find the formula anywhere except in this article. Thanks! -- Nomad84 (talk) 22:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this formula seems wrong. For one, the use of 1/(...) as a compound fraction can be simplified with basic algebra. The addition of a constant at the end also strikes me as odd. 173.52.4.231 (talk) 19:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Energy Tax Act/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==WP Tax Class==

Start class but could go easily up to B class with more references. Add more context and we have a Good Article or A class article.EECavazos 18:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==WP Tax Priority==

Mid priority because important tax law within a country. However, it is borderline with low priority because it's importance is just within the margin.EECavazos 18:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 14:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Energy Tax Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Energy_Tax_Act&oldid=1205284953"