Jump to content

Talk:Encanto (soundtrack)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: BigLordFlash (talk · contribs) 14:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will review this article. If you have any questions just talk to me on my talk page.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    I left some comments below. BigLordFlashtalk 17:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    I left some comments below. BigLordFlashtalk 17:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    It has a list of all references and footnotes. BigLordFlashtalk 17:04, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    I left some comments below. BigLordFlashtalk 16:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    C. It contains no original research:
    No original research. BigLordFlashtalk 17:04, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
    No copyright violations (Earwig) BigLordFlashtalk 17:04, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    All the main aspects are addressed. BigLordFlashtalk 17:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
    It stays focused on the topic. BigLordFlashtalk 17:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
    It's totally neutral. BigLordFlashtalk 17:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
    No edit wars or content dispute. BigLordFlashtalk 16:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    No copyright issues. BigLordFlashtalk 16:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    All images are relevant and have suitable captions. BigLordFlashtalk 16:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Lead

[edit]
  • Consequently instead of Consequentially - It's a direct cause, not an indirect cause. BigLordFlashtalk 17:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hot 100 top-ten instead of top-10 Hot 100 - It's more correct as you can see here. BigLordFlashtalk 17:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • the Grammy Awards for Best Compilation Soundtrack and Best Score Soundtrack for Visual Media, and Academy Award nominations for Best Original Score and Best Original Song ("Dos Oruguitas" by Sebastián Yatra) - Excessive use of the word "and". BigLordFlashtalk 17:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Done all. ℛonherry 13:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Development

[edit]

Music and lyrics

[edit]

Songs

[edit]

Albums charts

[edit]

Song charts

[edit]

Awards and nominations

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • The last sentence for "Development" has been done, but I found two more references clearing up the fact that there are 8 original songs and there is an English version of "Dos Oruguitas" → [1][2]. But I will say that the "Track listing" section explains the last two sentences, clearing up the instrumentals and the 27 score compositions, but it's honestly up to Ronherry to add a citation for the liner notes maybe? — VAUGHAN J. (t · c) 10:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Done. Added a citation for liner notes. ℛonherry 09:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

[edit]
  • Development – You should retitle to "Development and release" and merge with the below section per the short size.
@BigLordFlash:  Done ℛonherry 09:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a very well written article, without any problems, and meets the criteria for Good Article. I will pass this one. Congratulations! BigLordFlashtalk 12:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.