Talk:Enamorado Por Primera Vez/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Since you have two Wikicup nominations in the queue, I believe it is appropriate for me to take one on! --K. Peake 17:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks and happy belated birthday! Erick (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Magiciandude Your welcome and cheers for the wish; surprised you noticed the date was recently! --K. Peake 18:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- Remove the recording date, as it is only sourced as beginning that year
- Remove the word studios from any of the ones in the infobox since that is of the same name as the parameter
- Link to the music video in the infobox
- Shouldn't the English title be in bold too?
- No, since there isn't an official English-language version.
- Pipe pop to Pop music
- Wikilink power ballad per MOS:LINK2SECT
- "A music video for" → "The music video for" but the sentence should be the last one of the lead for the correct order
- "The track received positive reactions from three music journalists" → "The song received positive reactions from three music journalists," with the pipe
- "It was a recipient of the" → "The song was a recipient of an" plus start a new para at this sentence, as the following three sentences and the moved video sentence being afterwards will be enough
- "on top of the" → "on top of the US"
- Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine)
- "chart where it spent 12 weeks on" → "chart, spending 12 weeks at"
- "It also reached" → "The song also reached"
- Change Regional Mexican to Regional Mexican Airplay
- Remove the 11 weeks part because that is too much info for the lead when there's two charts mentioned in the sentence
- "it ended on the fourth and second position" → "it ended at the fourth and second positions"
Background and composition
[edit]- Pipe eponymous debut album to Enrique Iglesias (album)
- Were the 4.7 million copies sold worldwide or in the US; specify and if the latter, mentioned the US after the figure then change "in the US" at the end to "in the country" to avoid repeating the name.
- "reached number one on" → "reach number one on"
- "On August 1996," → "In August 1996,"
- "and that it would be released on" → "and it would be released in"
- "The record's title, Vivir, was" → "The album's title of Vivir was"
- "on December 1995 and was" → "in December 1995, before it was"
- "and co-wrote its" → "and he had co-wrote its"
- Since only Iglesias wrote the song, maybe you should mention it was solely composed by him with an appropriate source?
- Re-used Allmusic ref from the album.
- Pipe pop to Pop music
- Wikilink power ballad per MOS:LINK2SECT
- "clarified that the title" shouldn't you write "the song" instead, as he was probably referring to that and it is what the lead says?
- Yes, I meant "the song's title", but I took your suggestion anyway.
- "for the previous album," → "for Enrique Iglesias,"
Promotion and reception
[edit]- "and intersperses scenes with a" → "being interspersed with a"
- The Houston Chronicle review should be last since it is the only negative one
- "listed it as" → "listed the track as"
- "ten best songs." → "10 best songs." per MOS:NUM
- Start a new para at the award sentence that includes everything from there onwards, for separation from the negative review
- Remove pipe on "El Palo"
- The sixth number one and 12 weeks stat are not sourced; add the chart history at the end of the sentence using a ref name
- I initially didn't think it was necessary to source the 12 weeks part, since it's later sourced in the body of the article, but better safe than sorry.
- "it spent 12 weeks" → "the song spent 12 weeks"
- Change Regional Mexican to Regional Mexican Airplay
- "charts where it spent 11 weeks on this spot on" → "charts, spending 11 weeks at the top of"
- Pipe to Billboard Hot Latin Songs Year-End Chart should only be on "best-performing song"
- Why is the Chile chart position not written here or in the lead?
- I removed Chile because the charts are not from El Tiempo, but a reprint from a source that is not mentioned. Until I can find out where El Tiempo is getting the charts from, I'm going to refrain from using it.
- This is the correct decision to make, as it is dubious including a chart when only the country it covers is known. --K. Peake 08:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- The compilation albums should come directly after lead single since they are release info
Charts
[edit]Weekly charts
[edit]- Add the publisher in brackets for the Chile chart; I think it's El Tiempo?
- See above.
Year-end charts
[edit]- Good
See also
[edit]- Good
References
[edit]- Copyvio score looks amazing at 2.0%!!!!!
- Wikilink AllMusic on ref 1
- Remove wikilink on AllMusic for ref 2
- Why is there no work/publisher for ref 4?
- Cite ImpreMedia in via parameter instead for ref 5
- Just to clarify, as in the work? The article was written for La Opinión, not ImpreMedia.
- Magiciandude No, there is a separate parameter for "via" when you are citing what the article was written for; I have added for you. --K. Peake 08:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- WP:OVERLINK of Gannett on ref 13
- Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) and pipe Nielsen Business Media to Nielsen Holdings on ref 15
External links
[edit]- Good
Final comments and verdict
[edit]- On hold until all of the issues are fixed, after a quick review of this! --K. Peake 10:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've addressed pretty much everything and left a few comments above. Erick (talk) 22:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- ✓ Pass time, sorry I didn't check until now but I was too tired to focus much on Wiki after work yesterday! --K. Peake 08:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)