Talk:Enamorado Por Primera Vez

Enamorado Por Primera Vez has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 20, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Latin music Mid‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Enamorado por primera vez.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Enamorado Por Primera Vez/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Since you have two Wikicup nominations in the queue, I believe it is appropriate for me to take one on! --K. Peake 17:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and happy belated birthday! Erick (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Magiciandude Your welcome and cheers for the wish; surprised you noticed the date was recently! --K. Peake 18:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Remove the recording date, as it is only sourced as beginning that year
Remove the word studios from any of the ones in the infobox since that is of the same name as the parameter
Link to the music video in the infobox
Shouldn't the English title be in bold too?

No, since there isn't an official English-language version.

Pipe pop to Pop music
Wikilink power ballad per MOS:LINK2SECT
"A music video for" → "The music video for" but the sentence should be the last one of the lead for the correct order
"The track received positive reactions from three music journalists" → "The song received positive reactions from three music journalists," with the pipe
"It was a recipient of the" → "The song was a recipient of an" plus start a new para at this sentence, as the following three sentences and the moved video sentence being afterwards will be enough
"on top of the" → "on top of the US"
Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine)
"chart where it spent 12 weeks on" → "chart, spending 12 weeks at"
"It also reached" → "The song also reached"
Change Regional Mexican to Regional Mexican Airplay
Remove the 11 weeks part because that is too much info for the lead when there's two charts mentioned in the sentence
"it ended on the fourth and second position" → "it ended at the fourth and second positions"

Background and composition

Pipe eponymous debut album to Enrique Iglesias (album)
Were the 4.7 million copies sold worldwide or in the US; specify and if the latter, mentioned the US after the figure then change "in the US" at the end to "in the country" to avoid repeating the name.
"reached number one on" → "reach number one on"
"On August 1996," → "In August 1996,"
"and that it would be released on" → "and it would be released in"
"The record's title, Vivir, was" → "The album's title of Vivir was"
"on December 1995 and was" → "in December 1995, before it was"
"and co-wrote its" → "and he had co-wrote its"
Since only Iglesias wrote the song, maybe you should mention it was solely composed by him with an appropriate source?

Re-used Allmusic ref from the album.

Pipe pop to Pop music
Wikilink power ballad per MOS:LINK2SECT
"clarified that the title" shouldn't you write "the song" instead, as he was probably referring to that and it is what the lead says?

Yes, I meant "the song's title", but I took your suggestion anyway.

"for the previous album," → "for Enrique Iglesias,"

Promotion and reception

"and intersperses scenes with a" → "being interspersed with a"
The Houston Chronicle review should be last since it is the only negative one
"listed it as" → "listed the track as"
"ten best songs." → "10 best songs." per MOS:NUM
Start a new para at the award sentence that includes everything from there onwards, for separation from the negative review
Remove pipe on "El Palo"
The sixth number one and 12 weeks stat are not sourced; add the chart history at the end of the sentence using a ref name

I initially didn't think it was necessary to source the 12 weeks part, since it's later sourced in the body of the article, but better safe than sorry.

"it spent 12 weeks" → "the song spent 12 weeks"
Change Regional Mexican to Regional Mexican Airplay
"charts where it spent 11 weeks on this spot on" → "charts, spending 11 weeks at the top of"
Pipe to Billboard Hot Latin Songs Year-End Chart should only be on "best-performing song"
Why is the Chile chart position not written here or in the lead?

I removed Chile because the charts are not from El Tiempo, but a reprint from a source that is not mentioned. Until I can find out where El Tiempo is getting the charts from, I'm going to refrain from using it.

This is the correct decision to make, as it is dubious including a chart when only the country it covers is known. --K. Peake 08:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The compilation albums should come directly after lead single since they are release info

Charts

Weekly charts

Add the publisher in brackets for the Chile chart; I think it's El Tiempo?

See above.

Year-end charts

Good

References

Copyvio score looks amazing at 2.0%!!!!!
Wikilink AllMusic on ref 1
Remove wikilink on AllMusic for ref 2
Why is there no work/publisher for ref 4?
Cite ImpreMedia in via parameter instead for ref 5

Just to clarify, as in the work? The article was written for La Opinión, not ImpreMedia.

Magiciandude No, there is a separate parameter for "via" when you are citing what the article was written for; I have added for you. --K. Peake 08:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OVERLINK of Gannett on ref 13
Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) and pipe Nielsen Business Media to Nielsen Holdings on ref 15

External links

Good

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed, after a quick review of this! --K. Peake 10:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've addressed pretty much everything and left a few comments above. Erick (talk) 22:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass time, sorry I didn't check until now but I was too tired to focus much on Wiki after work yesterday! --K. Peake 08:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]