Talk:Enéas Carneiro

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Brazil: Government and laws Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Government and Laws of Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[History of Brazil#Military rule|military rule]] The anchor (#Military rule) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

I relied heavily on the Portugese Wikpedia article for most of my information. Not speaking a word of the language, I had to guess its meaning as best I could, with the help of Babel Fish (website). Another source was this German article about PRONA. I don't speak German either :P If anyone can do a better job translating the Portugese article, or knows more facts about this candidate, it goes without saying, please feel free to edit this article ruthlessly. LeoO3 03:27, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Will do. -- claviola 03:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Did he in fact die recently? I couldn't find any mention of his death on Google news, and the Portuguese article doesn't mention that either. Everyking 11:15, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He is alive and he is going to run for president in 2006

Isn´t he going to run for Federal Deputy in 2006? Manny 23:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He died yesterday, May 6th. --babbage 02:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extreme right?

Is he really considered extreme right in Brazil? I would have to say, from a Western (or at least NZ) point of view I wouldn't call him extreme right. Some of his policies are (atomics bombs, increasing military budget). Other's seem more left (nationalisation of mineral resources, opposition to free trade and globalisation). On that 2D chart thing that American Nolan Chart thing, I guess you really say he's a populist although not all 'populists' necessary believe in the merits of atomic bombs or even increasing the military budget... Nil Einne 18:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Location of death

This article originally said that he died at his daughter's home, however, the Portuguese article, from which I translated the paragraph about his death, states that Carneiro "went home" after deciding that his leukemia treatment wasn't resulting in improvements. It's a minor point, but I'm not sure whether he died at his home or his daughter's home. Going to see if I can track down that bit of information. --babbage 02:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Loaded sentence

The previously unknown politician was placed 12th out of a field of 21 candidates - this seems to imply that he was totally unknown, which is false - his book on electrocardiology was nicknamed by brazilian medical students Eneas's Bible years before he even thought about running for ~~dictatorship~~ presidency. And he got the ridiculously small 0.5% of the votes, which is probably much less than the number of people who knew and admired him as a physician. Albmont (talk) 21:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source: Daily journal of the national deputy chamber, published on 2008-04-01. Albmont (talk) 21:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Enéas's political spectrum

As requested and to provide onus, I'd like to bring to your attention that the passage "(...) which was usually seen as being far-right" is not accurate.

IstoE (supposedly from IstoE but hosted in an archived version of Geocites?) — says "Have far-right ideas, but deny politics." - This is a personal piece of opinion hold by the journalist, not a fact. She doesn't discuss or analyses why she said this.

BBC Title says "The return of Enéas, icon of the far-right and Bolsonaro's 'hero'". Another WP:EDITORIAL with a personal point of view, which is actually about Jair Bolsonaro. Later in the article it says: "The military regime and Enéas represent a certain continuity, with some modifications, of a long route of this right-wing nationalism".

We can use them to say "Author X said this; Author Y said that" but we can't report this in Wikipedia's voice, because what is verifiable is that the source expresses a view, not that the view is necessarily accurate.

Now please check these sources (available online):

Matos, Carolina (2008), "Journalism and Political Democracy in Brazil", Lexington Books, p. 295

Deutsch, Sandra McGee (1999), "Las Derechas: The Extreme Right in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile", Stanford University Press, p. 323

Mainwaring, Scott; Meneguello, Rachel; Power, Timothy J. (2000), "Conservative Parties, Economic Reform, and Democracy in Brazil", Johns Hopkins University Press, p. 180

Esteves Galvão Lopes, Guilherme (2016), "Enéas Carneiro e o PRONA: nacionalismo e conservadorismo no Brasil pós-ditadura militar", Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, p. 1

Handlin, Samuel (2017). State Crisis in Fragile Democracies: Polarization and Political Regimes in South America. Cambridge University Press. p. 126

The Wall Street Journal (may be subject to pay-wall)

Boston Globe

All of them describe Enéas and his party as being nationalist, conservative and/or right-wing and, except for The Wall Street and Boston Globe, they actually analyse in-depth his views and explain why he and his party was described this way. ErotsDaolpu (talk) 00:29, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources he is far-right; he denies. Still, stick to the sources. They are pretty clear on that. Coltsfan (talk) 00:48, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]