Talk:Empresses in the Palace

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: ChenLuo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plot condensing?

The Plot section (the only section) of this page appears quite... 'heavy'. Is it possible to condense or at least abbreviate parts of it? Also adding a Characters Section would be useful and help by moving parts of truncated plot to the Character sections. --31.52.49.92 (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

German wiki page

This series should have a German wiki page. I could start working on one.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Empresses in the Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111225002120/http://www.iemmys.tv:80/awards_nominees.aspx to http://www.iemmys.tv/awards_nominees.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Empresses in the Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Best Show Ever

As an American, I can obviously say this show is different than any I've ever watched. I've been watching a lot of Asian dramas and I know they're very intense, compared to American shows but this one was particularly frighteningly intense. Anyways, this made it to the top of my favorite Asian shows list. The only other show I love as much as this is a Korean drama called "Dong Yi". TorynPrix (talk) 18:25, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I happen to agree with you, but it's important to remember that Wikipedia is not a forum, and Talk pages should be used for discussions involving the article itself, not personal general opinions on the subject of the article. Matuko (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Controversial values" section

I have flagged the section "Controversial values" for having no inline citations and for reading like a personal essay. I would encourage the addition of references and a more encyclopedic tone to this section, preferably by someone who is literate in Chinese, as I assume most written commentary on the show and its effects on Chinese society will be in that language. Otherwise, the section should be deleted, I think. Matuko (talk) 21:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]