Jump to content

Talk:Emma Green (athlete)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Medal removed?

[edit]

Why was the entry athlets where e.g. Kajsa Bergqvist competed in 1993 and Carolina Klüft in 1995. One can find result information here. -- Jugalator 09:35, August 12, 2005 (UTC)

Emma Green Tregaro

[edit]

That's her real name, article should be renamed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.1.14.151 (talk) 10:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emma's rainbow nail varnish gesture:

[edit]

I'm very sorry to say that what is likely to become an iconic image of Emma's protest owned by Getty Images and uploaded as a thumbnail image to her article as fair use of an historical image as established in US case law has nevertheless been speedily deleted by Diannaa (talk). You can find my remarks specifically about the image here and my obsrvations about Wikipedia's policy here on my Talk page.

I would encourage anyone with a free image (i.e. an image in the public domain or owned by you) to upload it. You can email me on my Talk page (use the Toolbox on the left) if you need help. Elissa Rubria Honoria (talk) 02:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Emma Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 January 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There is a consensus that this athlete is not the primary topic for "Emma Green". Jenks24 (talk) 14:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Emma Green (athlete)Emma Green – The athlete is the primary subject, and clearly so compared to Emma Green (nurse) which has no incoming links and is a borderline notability case. The athlete is among the world's best high jumpers of her generation. SFB 19:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Upon closer review, neither of them seem particular primary, so the DAB should probably remain as is. Neither of Emma Greens have received ANY pageviews in the 90 days prior to this move request. Google results are a mess with results depending on how you search. But again, if the athlethe has no pageviews in 90 days it really says something about how much people are looking, or not looking for her on WP. That being said, Emma Green has been viewed a moderate amount of times in the last 90 days, and it appears nobody is following that to either the athlete or the nurse, so perhaps IIO is onto something with Emma Edwards Green. Tiggerjay (talk) 17:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per In ictu oculi. Emma Edwards Green was the only woman to design a U.S. state seal. StAnselm (talk) 09:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Nominator @Sillyfolkboy: asserts Emma Green (athlete) is the "primary subject" -- presumably because she is "among the best high jumpers of her generation". Well 19th Century Emma Green (nurse) is known long past her generation. I think this claim is an example of one of the WP:Arguments to avoid -- IDONTLIKEIT. Nominator's assertion that the new article had no incoming links was true when they requested this move, almost immediately after the new article was created. That's certainly false now.

    With regard to notability, no offense to our nominator, but IMO, their borderline claim suggests they haven't yet learned how to effectively research who is and isn't notable. For historic figures, like the 19th Century Emma Green, recent newspaper articles aren't usually the best source. Academic papers, history books, the web pages of museums are better sources.

    Note: No one is claiming their Emma Green namesake should have pride of place. Geo Swan (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - no clear indication of primacy by either subject. Onel5969 TT me 02:15, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emma Green (athlete). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]