Talk:Emily J. Miller

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership#David & Goliath Award|David & Goliath Award]] The anchor (#David & Goliath Award) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

This page needs updating on where Ms. Miller is working now. It seems she is no longer at One America News Network and the OANN webpage has scrubbed all references to her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.250.118.133 (talk) 02:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I object to the deletion because Ms. Miller is notable for her behavior in her position as an employee of famous individual. Her actions in the public/political sphere while an employee of Powell and DeLay -- including hijacking the camera on "This Week" during an interview with the Secretary of State -- are the basis for the entry, not her mere employment by them. Austinmayor 05:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a hatchet (and a hack) piece for an allegedly "encyclopedic" website. 66.55.6.146 (talk) 18:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article felt way too one sided for Wikipedian standards, leading me to believe that it had been written by Emily Miller herself, presumably for promotional purposes. There was no mention in the article of the events most likely to justify its existence, namely the Abramoff debacle and the Powell outburst. That is why I decided to make a few edits. --Casinojackviewer (talk) 12:03, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Her year of birth is wrong. This Politico article of 2013 notes she was 42 at the time, placing her year of birth at 1970 or 1971. https://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/50-politicos-to-watch-emily-miller-094204 "The 42-year-old Baltimore native’s ..."

Reorganization--- back to basics

This article needs more basic information that you would expect to find in a typical Wikipedia biography such as : DOB, place of birth, parents, dates and places of attendance at schools, etc. --Wlmg (talk) 19:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pronouns

According to Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Gender_identity pronouns should be respected on Wikipedia: "Refer to any person whose gender might be questioned with gendered words (e.g. pronouns, "man/woman", "waiter/waitress") that reflect the person's latest expressed gender self-identification as reported in the most recent reliable sources, even if it does not match what is most common in sources."

With my edits I wasn't trying to be funny, I'm just trying to get the article to adhere to the preferred pronouns as specified on Emily Miller's twitter: https://twitter.com/emilymiller

Unless anyone finds more recent sources of Miller's preferred pronouns we should stick to no/no on this article or avoid using pronouns. See also the discussion I had with Ingenuity: User_talk:Ingenuity#Emily_J._Miller_revert

Pingiun (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pingiun as User:Zaathras pointed out, saying "no/no" as their pronouns is just a joke to make fun of the LGBT community and shouldn't actually be used in the article. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 13:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ingenuity Why should we not use it? If no has given a preference, I think that preference should be respected Pingiun (talk) 13:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pingiun unless it can actually be shown that they _want_ to be known by those pronouns, which I highly doubt given that they are a right-wing media figure, the article should stay how it currently is. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 13:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found an article they wrote on the topic: [1]. So she doesn't actually want to be known by "no/no" it's just a protest against "wokeness". >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 13:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thank you for finding this source. It does indeed make the intentions clear Pingiun (talk) 13:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]