Talk:Emilio Elizalde

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

NASA ADS is quite enough

I do not see how NASA ADS could be judged non-reliable, etc. Wikipedia is full of pages of scientists in the same field of Elizalde having bibliometrics far worse than him. Thank you. 45 Wuz (talk) 08:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why the article did not get a "notability" tag. However, WP is an encyclopedia and statements need to be verifiable by references to independent "reliable sources". I know that WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. The correct response to that problem is to clean up those articles and bring them up to standards, not to lower our standards. --Randykitty (talk) 10:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why all this focus on bibliometrics? I think that the fact that his peers have seen fit to hold a conference honoring him is sufficient evidence of Elizalde's notability. His notability being established by such means, I'd even be tempted to delete mention of his h-index score. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 16:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]