Talk:Emil Tamsen

A fact from Emil Tamsen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 May 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that although Emil Tamsen fought for the British in the First Boer War, he became a friend of the Boer leader Paul Kruger?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emil Tamsen.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Philately Low‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Waterberg?

Wasn't Waterberg in German South West Africa?

OK there are two Waterbergs. But I hope you like the stamp anyway. Leutha (talk) 09:22, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks. I haven't been able to clarify Tamsen's loyalties. He was friendly with Paul Kruger and other Boers but seems to have been a soldier for the British at one point and to have been a member of the Royal Philatelic Society in London whose principal members included George V and Edward VII. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:55, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article

....but what an odd and unenlightening choice of a DYK, given that this man bought the contents of the dead letter office!

Amandajm (talk) 00:22, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We may have overlooked the potential fascination of the dead letter office. If you expand the article five times you can do a new DYK... Philafrenzy (talk) 00:55, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]